📺 Origin of Life -- scientific law denies it

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2013-10-25}

According to Skeptics, one of the characteristics of a pseudo-scientific theory is that it contradicts a known scientific law.

For instance, in biology, we have the law of biogenesis, which states that life only comes from life. Ironically, though, many self-professed Skeptics ignore this scientific law when it comes to the origin of life.

According to evolutionary theory, all life on earth can be traced back to a single-celled organism, which itself arose from non-living chemicals. But this is a clear contradiction of the law of biogenesis. And not surprisingly, so far, scientists have been unable to validate this belief.

Even Francis Crick, who won the Nobel Prize for co-discovering the structure of DNA admitted, 'An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle.' Maybe it was a miracle.

Related Articles:
Origin of Life Q&A
Origin of Life Instability of Building blocks
Hoyle Origin of Life
Origin of Life the Chirality Problem

Related Products:
Clash over Origins DVD
Codes and Creation DVD
Discovery Pack
Evolution Impossible DVD

📺 A Closer Look at Chemical Evolution (The Origin of Life)

Reasons to Believe ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-04-08}

Follow RTB_Official for updates!
Facebook:
Twitter:
Instagram:
Website:

📺 Can Science Explain the Origin of Life?

Stated Clearly ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-03-31}

Support Stated Clearly on Patreon:

Darwin's theory of biological evolution helps us understand how simple life forms can give rise to complex lifeforms, but how did the first reproducing creatures come about? The origin of life needs its own explanation.

Scientists don't currently have a complete explanation for life's origins, but different labs around the globe are looking into the idea that life may have emerged from chemistry. In this animation you will learn why they are studying this idea, and you'll get to see a few of the fascinating things they have discovered.

Here are some links for further learning (organized by topic):

OVERVIEW OF CURRENT RESEARCH

Here David Deamer gives a wonderful overview of our current understanding of the origin of life. This hour long lecture is presented in clear language for all to follow:

SELF-ASSEMBLY

News article on the self assembly of gene-like columns:

Video series on the self assembly of primitive cell membranes:

Video interview with chemist Jack Szostak. In it he goes over his work on self-assembling membranes and genes.

Scientific journal exploring molecules with self-assembly properties. (You need a subscription to the journal to get past the abstract)

RNA SYNTHESIS

Video on John Sutherland's production of RNA nucleotides

EARLY FOSSILS

David Attenborough explores the lives of early organisms found in the fossil record. This video explores the evolution of early organisms but does not go over the origin of the first living things.

METABOLIC PATHWAYS

This research explores a primitive metabolic pathway which could have easily formed through chemical evolution on the ancient earth (you need a subscription to the journal to get past the abstract)

Websites for further learning:

This Interactive website outlines many of the discoveries made by life origin researchers.

This website explains the research goals and findings of the Center for Chemical Evolution at Georgia Tech:

📺 The Big Bang: failed predictions and contradictions

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2013-10-23}

In 2004 New Scientist magazine published an open letter to the scientific community in which 33 leading scientists blasted the big bang. Their strongly-worded letter included statements like:
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed... Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory... But the big bang theory can't survive without these fudge factors... An open exchange of ideas is lacking in most mainstream conferences... [and] doubt and dissent are not tolerated."

With such growing dissension from secular scientists, it's unfortunate that many Christian leaders have embraced the big bang, especially when there are so many contradictions between it and the Bible's account of creation in Genesis. And Genesis is the word of the Creator who witnessed creation, unlike any scientist.

Related Articles:
Secular scientists blast the big bang ( )
Bye-bye, big bang? ( )
The Big Bang fails another test ( )
High-redshift quasars produce more big bang surprises ( )
Light-travel time: a problem for the big bang ( )

Related Products:
Dismantling the Big Bang ( )
Starlight, Time and the New Physics ( )
Distant Starlight - A Forum DVD ( )

📺 Bill Nye Destroys Noah's Ark

The Daily Conversation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-02-07}

Bill Nye debunks the Bible's mythical story of Noah's Ark during a debate with Creationist Ken Ham at the Creation Museum in Kentucky.

Subscribe to TDC on YouTube

Facebook

Google+

Twitter

📺 No evolution for 3.5 billion years???

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 2 years ago 2015-07-28}

Stromatolites are regarded by many as the oldest fossils on earth. They are interpreted as the remains of colonies of blue-green algae, or more accurately, cyanobacteria. The oldest ones are claimed to be 3.5 billion years old. Within this evolutionary perspective, one would expect these colonies to have radically changed, but remarkably, they are essentially the same today. Stromatolites, therefore, are classic examples of living fossils.

Living fossils cause major problems for evolution because they provide stunning examples of how evolution hasn’t occurred.

They also call into question the evolutionary timeframe.

Some people try to downplay the significance of living fossils by arguing that when something is well adapted to its environment it doesn’t need to change. But this would need the environment to be constant for the supposed period of time. This argument cannot apply to stromatolites, because during 3.5 billion years of alleged evolutionary time, many radical environmental changes supposedly occurred, including the arrival of new predators and parasites. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com

Related Articles:
Living fossils: a powerful argument for creation
Evolutionists can’t dodge ‘Living Fossils’

Related Products:
Living Fossils—Evolution: The Grand Experiment Vol 2

📺 The Inner Life of the Cell

XVIVO Scientific Animation ^{📤 6 years ago 2011-07-11}

Harvard University selected XVIVO to develop an animation that would take their cellular biology students on a journey through the microscopic world of a cell, illustrating mechanisms that allow a white blood cell to sense its surroundings and respond to an external stimulus. This award winning piece was the first topic in a series of animations XVIVO is creating for Harvard's educational website BioVisions at Harvard.

📺 What’s the difference between a scientific law and theory? - Matt Anticole

TED-Ed ^{📤 2 years ago 2015-11-17}

View full lesson:

Chat with a friend about an established scientific theory, and she might reply, “Well, that’s just a theory.” But a conversation about an established scientific law rarely ends with “Well, that’s just a law.” Why is that? What is the difference between a theory and a law... and is one “better”? Matt Anticole shows why science needs both laws and theories to understand the whole picture.

Lesson by Matt Anticole, animation by Zedem Media.

📺 Finely tuned Earth - designed for life

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-29}

If you were able to choose the planet you lived on, which one would it be? Well, I would definitely choose earth, because it is so well suited for life. Whether you're considering the Earth's distance from the sun, or its gravity, axial tilt or magnetic field, one conclusion is inescapable. Earth is finely tuned for life.
Many see this as evidence for a designer but others don't. If earth wasn't finely tuned, they say, we wouldn't even exist so it doesn't indicate a designer. But is that a satisfactory answer? Imagined you were dragged before a trained firing squad and they all fired and all missed. If I asked you why you're not dead and you answered, "Well if I did die I wouldn't be here to tell you," you think I'd be satisfied with that explanation?
In the same way, atheists cannot give a satisfactory answer for earth being so finely tuned for life.

Related Articles:
The Universe is finely tuned for life
Mars Red Planet
Created to be inhabited
The wonders of water

Related Products:
Creation Answers Book
Creation Magazine
Exploring the world around you

📺 Abiogenesis: The Faith and the Facts

Access Research Network ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-02-08}

Dr. Edward Peltzer explores the possibilities that

1. Life is the result of unguided chemical reactions and random processes
2. Life is the result of purposeful physical laws and initial conditions
3. The laws of nature and fine-tuning of the initial conditions are sufficient to account for the origin of life
4. natural processes alone prohibit the origin of life

After reviewing the evidence for each option Dr. Peltzer comes to the conclusion that chemical cross-reactions, including the Maillard reaction, would have prevented a purely naturalistic origin of life. His research thus supports the Law of Biogenesis, that life proceeds only from pre-existing life.

(Additional info: arn.org/arnproducts/php/video_show_item.php?id=71)

📺 DW - Live (English)

DW English ^{📤 4 months ago 2018-02-19}

International news in English 24/7.
DW is the flagship channel for Germany's international broadcaster and provides quality news and information across the globe. DW covers issues that are shaping the world – made in Germany, made for minds.

Subscribe for more -
Visit our website -
The latest News on Twitter -
Join the discussion on Facebook -

📺 Bio 14.2 - Spontaneous Generation vs Biogenesis

Science With Mr J ^{📤 3 years ago 2015-04-13}

📺 Friends - Ross and Phoebe argue about Evolution

Glenn Davey ^{📤 9 years ago 2009-05-14}

Season 2, episode 3 - The One Where Heckles Dies

Ross the palaeontologist, and Phoebe the new-age free spirit, argue the truth of Evolution.

Real scientists will balk at both Ross's strident approach to explaining science to a lay-person and Phoebe's dualist irrationale. Both are very funny characters, though, and it's a good little example of where these sorts of conversations can go off the rails.

(Evolution is true, though).

Warner Bros. copyright clips fairly used, in part only, to promote the show. No ownership claimed.

📺 Life from non-life (Creation Magazine LIVE! 3-14)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-30}

Has the law of biogenesis (life begets life) been broken? Evolution says yes. However, when established scientific laws that describe the natural world are broken we recognize that as supernatural, or miraculous. So then, does the origin of life require the supernatural?

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
The Primitive atmosphere ( )
Origin of life: the polymerization problem ( )
15 loopholes in the evolutionary theory of the origin of life: Summary ( )
Origin of life: the chirality problem ( )
Self-replicating enzymes? ( )
Life from life... or not? ( )
Origin of Life Q&A page ( )
Biology in Six Days ( )
Could Monkeys Write the 23 Psalm? ( )

Related Products:
By Design ( )
Codes and Creation ( )
Evolution Impossible ( )
Evolution: Good Science? ( )
In the Beginning was Information ( )

📺 Dating the Earth - How old is it?

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-06}

If someone decided to bake a cake to celebrate the earth's birthday, how many candles should they put on it? Some people contend that you'd need 4.5 billion, because they believe the earth is that old.

However, many are surprised to discover that this figure did not coming from dating earth rocks, but rather rocks from outer space. A famous study published in 1956, dated a group of meteorites at 4.5 billion years and they assumed that this was the age of the earth.

Like all radioactive dating studies, these methods relay on a number of questionable assumptions but unlike dating earth rocks, this study also relied on the speculation that meteorites are leftover junk from earth's formation. Contemporary geologist, Arthur Holmes, remarked that this speculation was "unsound in principal."

But for ideas to become firmly entrenched it doesn't necessarily require solid data, it just needs sufficient repetition.

Related Articles:
How old is the Earth?
Radiometric dating and the age of the earth
101 evidences for a young age of the earth
Flaws in dating the earth as ancient

Related Products:
The Age of the Earth DVD
Creation magazine subscription
The Dating Game DVD
A Brief but True History of Time DVD

📺 Ted Cruz: I don’t believe in climate change because I ‘follow the science’

Raw Story ^{📤 3 years ago 2015-03-24}

📺 Scientific evidence for a recent creation -- Creation Magazine LIVE! (2-05)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-02-19}

All dating methods involve making assumptions. But many scientific dating methods, with reasonable assumptions, do not support deep time and an old universe. Hundreds of dating methods support a young earth and recent creation of the universe.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe ( )
Dinosaur soft tissue and protein—even more confirmation! ( )
Aren't 250 million year old live bacteria a bit much? ( )
Radioactive decay points to a recent creation ( )
Mitochondrial Eve and biblical Eve are looking good: criticism of young age is premature ( )
Y-Chromosome Adam? ( )
Patriarchs of the forest ( )
Coal: memorial to the Flood ( )
Opals in months—not millions of years! ( )
Niagara Falls and the Bible ( )
Salty seas—Evidence for a young earth ( )
Does Creation make the Gospel a laughing stock? ( )

Related Products:
15 Reasons to take Genesis as History ( )
Refuting Compromise ( )
What the Bible & Science Say About the Age of the Earth ( )
Creation magazine ( )

📺 Abiogenesis

Bozeman Science ^{📤 6 years ago 2011-06-25}

010 - Abiogenesis

Paul Andersen describes how life could have formed on our planet through natural processes. The progression from monomers, to polymers, to protocells and finally to cells is described. The Miller-Urey experiment is described in detail as well as characteristics of the latest universal ancestor.

Do you speak another language? Help me translate my videos:

All of the images are licensed under creative commons and public domain licensing:
Darwin, Francis. English: A Photographic Portrait of Darwin Standing Next to a Pillar in the Book Charles Darwin Published in 1908, Edited by His Son Francis Darwin. Photo Was Taken c. 1881 by Messers. Elliot and Fry. Signature of Darwin Is Below the Photograph., April 16, 2013. Charles Darwin. .
File: Harold Urey.jpg, n.d. .
"File:Citric Acid Cycle with Aconitate 2.svg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, May 7, 2013. .
"File:Full Length Hammerhead Ribozyme.png." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed November 10, 2013. .
"File:Louis Pasteur, Foto Av Félix Nadar Crisco Edit.jpg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, October 26, 2013. .
"File:Miller-Urey Experiment-en.svg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed November 10, 2013. .
"File:Stromatolites in Shark Bay.jpg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed November 10, 2013. .
"File:Stromatolites.jpg." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Accessed November 10, 2013. .
Netherlands, FotoosVanRobin from. English: Reindeer Steaks from the Lidl, Sold for € 39,50 P/kg. I Dediced to Smoke Them in My Stovetop Smoker and Quickly Grill Them. As They Were Quite Thin I Was Afraid to Overcook Them, but They Turn Out Nice and Rare. Very Tender Meat, with a Slight Gamy Taste. A Bit Like Springbok, I Think., February 23, 2010. Reindeer steak. .
Unknown. Stanley Miller, [object HTMLTableCellElement]. web99.arc.nasa.gov/~astrochm/Miller/photo.html. .
User:Img. This File Has No Description, and May Be Lacking Other Information., Unknown date. Self-photographed. .

📺 NASA Live - Earth From Space (HDVR) ♥ ISS LIVE FEED #AstronomyDay2018 | Subscribe now!

SPACE & UNIVERSE (Official) ^{📤 1 year ago 2017-04-04}

Live (2018) NASA Earth from Space - "International Astronomy Day", ISS HD Video is presented. NASA Live stream of Earth seen from space powered by NASA HDEV cameras aboard the International Space Station. Watch the Earth roll Captured by HDEV cameras on board the International Space Station.

▰ Get Live Alerts: (Rocket Launches & Webcasts)

▰ Poll Results:

Updates:
(June 22/23:) A Rocket Lab Electron rocket will launch on its third flight, titled "It's Business Time," from the Mahia Peninsula on New Zealand's North Island. The 4-hour launch window opens at 8:30 p.m. EDT (0300 GMT on June 23).

(June 29:) A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch the Dragon cargo spacecraft (CRS-15) from Cape Canaveral, Florida on a cargo delivery flight to the International Space Station. Liftoff is scheduled for 5:41 a.m. EDT (0941 GMT). [Watch Live]

(July 9:) A Russian Soyuz rocket will launch the 70th Progress cargo spacecraft to the International Space Station from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan at 5:51 p.m. EDT (2151 GMT). It will dock at the space station at 9:39 p.m. EDT (0139 GMT on July 10). [Watch Live]

(July 13:) A partial solar eclipse will be visible from southern Australia, the Pacific and the Indian Ocean. [Solar Eclipse Guide 2018: When, Where & How to See Them]

(July 19:) A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch the Telstar 19 VANTAGE communications satellite from Cape Canaveral, Florida at 1:50-5:50 a.m. EDT (0550-0950 GMT). The satellite provide high-throughput Ku-band and Ka-band communications services over South America, the Caribbean, the North Atlantic and Canada.

(July 20:) A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch 10 satellites for the Iridium Next mobile communications fleet from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California at 8:12 a.m. EDT (1212 GMT).

(July 25:) Arianespace will use an Ariane 5 ES rocket to launch four Galileo satellites for Europe's Galileo navigation constellation. The rocket will launch from Kourou, French Guiana at 7:24 a.m. EDT (1124 GMT).

(July 27/28:) A total lunar eclipse, also known as a "blood moon," will be visible from Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean and Antarctica. [Lunar Eclipse 2018 Guide]

(Aug. 13:) The Perseid meteor shower will peak before dawn in the early morning hours of Monday, Aug. 13.

▰ 2018 Upcoming Events (Full list):

NASA Crew inside the international space station:
Oleg Artemyev
Commander Drew Feustel
Ricky Arnold
Sergey Prokopyev
Alexander Gerst
Serena Auñón-Chancellor

Mission Overview
3/21/18 - Exp 55/56 Launch
3/23/18 - Exp 55/56 Dock
6/6/18 - Exp 56/57 Launch
6/8/18 - Exp 56/57 Dock
6/14/18 - U.S. Spacewalk (6:49)
10/4/18 - Exp 55/56 Land
12/13/18 - Exp 56/57 Land

By the courtesy of International Space Station:
UStream live Feed From the NASA HDEV live cameras aboard the ISS. Watch the earth roll

SPACE & UNIVERSE Network

The International Space Station - ISS - circles the earth at 240 miles above the planet, on the edge of space in low earth orbit. The station is crewed by NASA astronauts as well as Russian Cosmonauts and a mixture of Japanese, Canadian and European astronauts as well.

Please Standby mode (Bluescreen)
The signal is temporarily lost from the international space station, live on UStream.tv

The ISS passes into the dark side of the earth for roughly half of each of its 90-minute orbits. As the Space Station passes into a period of night every 45 mins video is unavailable - during this time, and other breaks in transmission recorded footage is shown when back in daylight earth will recommence. As seen from the Nasa ISS live stream on the International Space Station -
A real astronaut view of Earth! Captured by ISS HDEV cameras on board the International Space Station.

We love ❤ Space
Do you?

┈
Live chat:
- English only.
- Other languages, special characters, links will be automatically blocked.
Please do not share any personal information in Live chat.
(This stream may upset those who believe in a Theory such as Flat-earth, Please make an effort to share a constructive comment on live chat. theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/20/flat-earth-believers-youtube-videos-conspiracy-theorists)
┈
Music (CC)
"Garden Music" Kevin MacLeod

"Fluidscape" Kevin MacLeod

📺 Steely Dan - Jack Of Speed

soulbrothanumbahone ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-04-04}

Are You Experienced? Check Our My Other Channels.

SuperbMusicExp The Superb Full Album Experience PLUS superb random songs.

soulbrothanumbahone The Superb Music Experience

kacobb2 The Superb Soulful Music Experience

thejazzcafe1 The Superb Smooth Jazz Experience

As always, request are always welcome! Thank you for your time!!!

Enjoy!!!!!!!!

Kev

📺 Neil deGrasse Tyson on the New Cosmos

Moyers & Company ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-10}

This week on Moyers & Company, Bill talks with the astrophysicist about his redux of the famous Carl Sagan series and why science and science literacy matter in a democracy

📺 Scientific Law vs Scientific Theory

pactiss ^{📤 9 years ago 2008-08-11}

PACTISS.org - Philosophers and Critical Thinkers in Senior Schools vodcast. The difference between a law and a theory in science(philosophy of science).

📺 Dinosaurs and the Bible (Creation Magazine LIVE! 1-11)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 6 years ago 2011-10-10}

For details visit:

Dinosaurs, those fascinating and mysterious creatures beg the question: where do they fit into the Bible? Evolution says dinosaurs fit into history millions of years ago. The Bible says that land animals (which would include dinosaurs) were created on Day 6 (the same day as people). Which view does science support? Get ready for amazing evidence showing that dinosaurs lived recently, just like the Bible says.

Related articles
- What about dinosaurs? (Chapter 19 from The Creation Answers Book) ( )
- How did dinosaurs grow so big? And how did Noah fit them on the Ark? ( )
- Dracorex —the dinosaur that looks like a dragon. ( )
- Squirming at Squishosaur ( )
- 'Schweitzer's Dangerous Discovery' ( )

In the News
- Newly Discovered Horned Dinosaur Follows Evolutionary Theory, Scientists Say ( )
- Squishosaur scepticism squashed -- protein (collagen) discovered in T-rex bones. ( )
- Grass eating dinosaurs—A 'time travel' problem for evolution? ( )

Feedback
- Dinosaurs, dating and the age of the earth ( )
- Where are all the human fossils? (Chapter 15 from the The Creation Answers Book) ( )

Also see
- Dinosaurs Q&A page ( )

📺 El origen de la vida - Explicación Sencilla HD (720p). ESPAÑOL

TOABU2013 ^{📤 6 years ago 2012-06-07}

El origen de la vida Explicación Sencilla (720p). HD universo biológico biologic universo toabu bacterias microorganismos fácil niños animacion Van Helmont Redi Spallanzani Needham Oparin Miller caldo experimento biologia creacionismo biogenesis panspermia generacion espontanea creationism origin beginning life experiment animation spontaneous generation

📺 Is Naturalistic Biogenesis Scientific? A. E. Wilder-Smith

Dave Flang ^{📤 10 years ago 2007-09-13}

SPONTANEOUS GENERATION
The theory of life from non-living things is the error of "spontaneous generation,"
Spontaneous generation was called abiogensis and is now referred by evolutionists as biopoiesis.

"Biogenesis is a term in biology that is derived from two Greek words meaning life and birth. According to the theory of biogenesis, living things decended only from nonliving things. They cannot develope spontaneously from nonliving materials. Until comparatively recent times, scientists believed that certain tiny forms of life, such as bacteria, arose spontaneously from non-living substances." *Biogenesis, "World Book Encyclopedia, p. B-242 (1972 edition).

"Pasteur's demonstration apparently laid the theory of spontaneous generation to rest permanently. All this left a germ of embarrassment for scientists. How had life originated after all, if not through divine creation or through spontaneous generation?.."They [today's scientists] are back to spontaneous generation, but with a difference. The pre-Pasteur view of spontaneous generation was of something taking place now and quickly. The modern view is that it took place long ago and very slowly." *Isaac Asimov, Asimov's New Guide to Science (1984), pp. 638-639.

"His aphorism 'omnis cellula e cellula' [every living cell arises from a preexisting living cell] ranks with Pasteur's 'omne vivum vivo' [every living thing arises from a preexisting a preexisting living thing] as among the most revolutionary generalizations of biology' *Rudolf Virchow, *Encyclopedia Britannica. 1973 Edition, Vol. 23, p. 35.

" 'Spontaneous generation is a chimera [illusion].'--Louis Pasteur, French chemist and microbiologist." *Isaac Asimov's Book of Science and Nature Quotations (1988), p. 193.

"What really matters, to start life, is the faculty of reproduction" (*G. Montalenti, Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, 1974, p. 13)

"You may be surprised to hear that the origin of species remains just as much a mystery today, despite the efforts of thousands of biologists. The topic has been the main focus of attention and is beset by endless controveries." *Gordon R. Tayor, Great Evolution Mystery (1983), p. 140.

"Mathematics and dynamics fail us when we contemplate the earth, fitted for life but lifeless, and try to imagine the commencement of life upon it. This certainly did not take place by any action of chemistry, or electricity, or crystalline grouping of molecules under the influence of force, or by any possible kind of fortuitous concourse of atmosphere. We must pause, face to face with the mystery and miracle of creation of living things." Lord Kevin, quoted in Battle for Creation, p. 232.

Mathematics, Probabilities and DNA

Spontaneous Generation

DNA and RNA

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution -

Live broadcasting with instant message -

KJV1611 Bible -

📺 Neo-catastrophism vs uniformitarianism (Creation Magazine LIVE! 3-23)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-31}

Uniformitarianism (long shown by creationists to be an inadequate mechanism to produce the rock and fossil record) was once the foundational 'doctrine' of the geologist. Many geologists now accept 'Neo-catastrophism' (many catastrophes over millions of years). Why the change, and does this theory fare any better?

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
Secular Neocatastrophism ( )
The origins of old Earth geography and its ramifications for the 21'st century ( )
Geology Q&A page ( )
Charles Lyell's hidden agenda: To "free science from Moses" ( )

Related Products:
Biblical Geography: Properly Understanding the Rocks ( )
Earth's Catastrophic Past ( )
Set in Stone ( )
A Brief but true history of time ( )
Behemoth Buried Alive ( )

📺 If God created the universe then who created God? (Creation Magazine LIVE! 7-03)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 months ago 2018-01-24}

This common question has a simple answer and a more complex answer. Today we examine both of them.

Related Articles:
If God created the universe, then who created God? ( )
Who created God? ( )
Who made God? ( )

Related Products:
Who made God? DVD ( )
The Creation Answers Book ( )
Christianity for Skeptics ( )
Creation magazine (free sample copy) ( )

📺 Thermodynamics of Living systems-Origin of Life

trustworthyno1 ^{📤 6 years ago 2011-08-22}

"Understanding how life emerged on Earth within 1,000 million years of its formation is a fascinating scientific problem "

Prof Ian Smith, University of Cambridge
Life on Earth was unlikely to have emerged from volcanic springs or hydrothermal vents, according to a leading US researcher.
Experiments carried out in volcanic pools suggest they do not provide the right conditions to spawn life.

David Deamer, emeritus professor of chemistry at the University of California at Santa Cruz, said ahead of his presentation: "It is about 140 years since Charles Darwin suggested that life may have begun in a 'warm little pond'.

"We are now testing Darwin's idea, but in 'hot little puddles' associated with the volcanic regions of Kamchatka (Russia) and Mount Lassen (California, US)."
"The results are surprising and in some ways disappointing. It seems that hot acidic waters containing clay do not provide the right conditions for chemicals to assemble themselves into 'pioneer organisms.'"
Professor Deamer said that amino acids and DNA, the "building blocks" for life, and phosphate, another essential ingredient, clung to the surfaces of clay particles in the volcanic pools.

"The reason this is significant is that it has been proposed that clay promotes interesting chemical reactions relating to the origin of life," he explained.

"However," he added, "in our experiments, the organic compounds became so strongly held to the clay particles that they could not undergo any further chemical reactions."

If it is hard to imagine polypeptides or polysaccharides in primordial waters it is harder still to imagine polynucleotides. But so powerful has been the effect of Miller's experiment on the scientific imagination that to read some of the literature on the origin of life (including many elementary texts) you might think that it had been well demonstrated that nucleotides were probable constituents of a primordial soup and hence that prevital nucleic acid replication was a plausible speculation based on the results of experiments.

There have indeed been many interesting and detailed experiments in this area. But the importance of this work lies, not in demonstrating how nucleotides could have formed on the primitive Earth, but in precisely the opposite: these experiments allow us to see, in much greater detail than would otherwise have been possible, just why prevital nucleic acids are highly implausible.

This video is based upon the book

""The Mystery of Life's Origin:
Reassessing Current Theories

by
Charles B. Thaxton
Walter L. Bradley
Roger L. Olsen"'

The purpose of this video is to spread his work and to refer it easily on youtube as it is difficult to cite a particular point on a whole book

I created this video with the YouTube Video Editor ( )

📺 Facts Of Evolution (Cassiopeia Project)

Religion, Atheism, Science ^{📤 6 years ago 2012-02-18}

If you want to know what the scientists know about evolution, then here it is. An enormous breadth of information, assimilated, compressed, and congealed into an easily understood, visually irresistible presentation. "Facts Of Evolution" has layer upon layer of evidence that makes common descent and macroevolution inescapable.

Part 2 - Mechanisms of Evolution:

Hominid transitional skulls:
Frequently asked questions about evolution:
Evolution: Fact and Theory:
Evidence of Common Descent:
101 Reasons Why Evolution is True:
Human Evolution:
Evolution 101:
More lines of evidence:
15 evolutionary gems:
8 examples of evolution in action:
Top 10 Myths About Evolution:

See for more educational videos.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.

📺 Origin of Life -- scientific law denies it