CMIcreationstation^{📤 7 years ago 2011-05-17}

For more details visit:

In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss amino acids (constituents of proteins) found in both hadrosaur skin and a claw, and how evolutionists would have charged "contamination" if actual proteins had been found. However, dinosaur protein has been found in a partially fossilized Tyrannosaurus Rex leg bone!

Main article:
From Creation magazine 32(2) Dino protein denial
( )

Related articles
• 'Schweitzer's Dangerous Discovery' ( )
• Dinosaur soft tissue and protein—even more confirmation! ( )
• The real 'Jurassic Park' ( )
• Why don't they carbon-date dino fossils? ( )
• Dinosaur proteins and blood vessels: are they a big deal? ( )
• Radiocarbon in diamonds: enemy of billions of years ( )

For more information on the creation/evolution issue visit:

Dinosaurs Documentary: THE MUMMIFIED DINOSAUR [Special FULL Documentary]

Angelyn Armida^{📤 2 years ago 2016-02-26}

Are fossils ever found in the wrong place?

CMIcreationstation^{📤 7 years ago 2011-05-05}

For more details visit:

In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss common misconceptions about the geologic column and the fossils it contains. Many people remember being taught that the fossil record shows a progression of evolution over millions of years, with a certain fixed order of fossils showing a lineage of simpler to more complex forms. Recent findings that have forced a rethinking of evolutionary assumptions that overthrow the idea that fossils are never found 'out of place'.

Main article:
Creation magazine 32(3) Are fossils ever found in the wrong place? ( )

Related articles
• How well do paleontologists know fossil distributions? ( )
• The 'Lazarus effect': rodent 'resurrection'! ( )
• Evolution Pushed Further into the Past ( )
• Arthropods supposedly invaded land 40 million years earlier ( )
• 'Oldest' fossil shrimp? ( )

For more information on the creation/evolution issue visit

Dinosaur blood and polystrate trees debunked

Potholer54debunks^{📤 8 years ago 2010-05-05}

Sources quoted in this video:

"Heme compounds in dinosaur Trabecular bone" -- Schweitzer, et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, June 1997

Soft-tissue vessels and Cellular preservation in Tyrranosaurus Rex Schweitzer et al., Science 2005

Biomolecular Characterization and Protein Sequences of the Campanian Hadrosaur B. canadensis Schweitzer et al., Science, May 2009

The Geological Structure, Organic Remains, and Mineral Resources of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island -- Dawson, J.W., 1868. Acadian Geology., Published by MacMillan and Co.

Sorry it's been so long, but if you appreciate that the quality of these videos and the research that goes into them, then please appreciate that it takes time to get it right. I'd go for quality rather than quantity any day. Since I have two channels, and spend so much time travelling, expect a new video on this cvhannel about once every three months.

soft tissue in dino fossils-nothing in science can allow this to be millions of years old

TruthIsLife7^{📤 7 years ago 2010-12-08}

Dr. Mary Schweitzer and her research assistants were working on a T-rex dinosaur fossil and saw medullary tissue (showing that the T-rex had been pregnant). Because no one had ever found this tissue in a dinosaur fossil before, she told her assistant to soak it in acid to be able to study the structures better. When they tried this new approach, they were stunned to find blood vessels, bone matrix and elastic tissues in the fossil, all soft tissues found somewhere they shouldn't be according to evolution. Schweitzer et al. also found evidence of degraded hemoglobin fragments and structures that might represent altered blood remnants.

She eventually published a number of papers (references and links below) which right from the first challenged the basic principles of fossilization by stating,
"Soft tissues and cell-like microstructures derived from skeletal elements of a well-preserved Tyrannosaurus rex (MOR 1125) were represented by four components in fragments of demineralized cortical and/or medullary bone: flexible and fibrous bone matrix; transparent, hollow and pliable blood vessels; intravascular material, including in some cases, structures morphologically reminiscent of vertebrate red blood cells; and osteocytes with intracellular contents and flexible filipodia."

Dr. Mary Schweitzer, states, "When you think about it, the laws of chemistry, biology and and everything else we know, say it should be gone, it should be degraded completely."
(~6:30)

Derrick Briggs, curator of invertebrate paleontology at the Peabody Museum at Yale University agrees saying, "Nobody was imaging that dinosaurs might have had preserved soft tissues... this was totally improbable....We have this clear understanding that part of all biological cycles involves decay. Nature's set up to break down that material and recycle it. So, it's just improbable that those kinds of very delicate structures would survive, particularly for millions of years."

He's also agreeing that nothing we can verify with science would allow soft tissue to last for millions of years. The obvious conclusion is that they are not millions of years as Creationists have said for long. Remember that evidence from your critics is one of the highest levels evidence you can get. Creationists have that in MANY areas. Evolutionists don't.

Leading evolution experts agree that nothing in science would make it possible for soft tissue to last more than ~100,000 years ( ~8:30)

Why don't we know of more soft tissues in fossils?
1) As. Dr. Schweitzer said, she used a new technique with acid to remove bones that almost no one had used before. If more used that method, we'd find more soft tissue in fossils. Dr. Kaye tried to replicate Dr. Schweitzer and found a very large amount of soft tissue with her technique just like she did.
2) There actually are quite a number of other soft tissue finds.
A) Soft tissue in fossilized salamandar.

B) DNA extracted from bacteria that are supposed to be 425 million years old brings into question that age, because DNA could not last more than thousands of years.

C)
and others.

3) Even evolutionists say that only a very few of biological forms that die become fossils and most of those are marine animals or were buried in water (things that make you go hmmm...when considering the flood story).

RESEARCH PAPERS BY SCHWEITZER
***Soft tissue and cellular preservation in vertebrate skeletal elements from the Cretaceous to the present

***Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex

**Schweitzer MH, Wittmeyer JL, Horner JR. 2007. Soft tissue and cellular preservation in vertebrate skeletal elements from the Cretaceous to the present. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 274:183-187; 2. Schweitzer MH, Suo Z, Avci R, Asara JM, Allen MA, Teran Arce F, Horner JR. 2007.

****More detailed interview with the researchers & info in notes here:

How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 21 Dinosaur Soft Tissue

Tony Reed^{📤 2 years ago 2015-10-17}

In this episode, we examine the nail in the coffin for evolutionism. Soft-tissue discovered inside a T-Rex.

References:

Creationist version

Mary Schweitzer's Original Paper

Dinosaur Peptides Suggest Mechanisms of Protein Survival

Soft tissue and cellular preservation in vertebrate skeletal elements from the Cretaceous to the present:

How the collagen was extracted

What Acid

Demineralization

Spectroscopy:

Amber Inclusions

Recent Amber inclusion soft tissue

Smithsonian article

Bacterial Biofilm

Well, maybe

Mary Schweitzer's paper on Iron preservation

Update: Iron preservation confirmed
qabalaHCTMRS

Tracing the nations back to Babel (Creation Magazine LIVE! 3-12)

CMIcreationstation^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-30}

Extra-Biblical historical records testify to the ancient nations beginning as family units from Noah's descendants. This powerfully supports the Bible's history, especially the reality of the world's population 'restarting' after the Flood of Noah.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
Creation Magazine LIVE! Season 2 Episode 4 ( )
In the days of Peleg ( )
Tower of Babel confirms linguistics ( )
The 16 grandsons of Noah ( )
Chinese characters and Genesis ( )
Where are all the people? ( )
Egyptian history and the Bible ( )

Related Products:
Languages: The Bible vs Evolution ( )
Mitochondrial Eve and the Daughters of Noah ( )
Oracle Bones Speak ( )

Michio Kaku: Can We Resurrect the Dinosaurs? Neanderthal Man?

Big Think^{📤 6 years ago 2012-09-20}

Don't miss new Big Think videos! Subscribe by clicking here:

Dr. Kaku answers the question of whether it is possible to resurrect the dinosaurs by "turning on" their ancient genes? Moreover, now that we have also sequenced the genes of the Neanderthal man, at some point in the future it may be possible to bring him back. And then of course, if a young Neanderthal boy is born then the question is where do you put the boy, in a zoo or at Harvard?

Transcript--
Michio Kaku: We have taken cells from the carcass of an animal that died decades ago and brought them back to life and so it is possible using today's technology to take bodies, carcasses of animals that died decades ago and resurrect them in the form of clones. Now we have also sequenced the genes of the Neanderthal man, meaning that at some point in the future it may be possible to bring back the Neanderthal man. In fact, at Harvard University one professor even made a proposal as to how much it would cost to reassemble the genome of the Neanderthal man. And then of course, if a young Neanderthal boy is born then the question is where do you put the boy, in a zoo or at Harvard?
This is a question that we're going to be facing in the coming decades because it is possible that we might be able to bring back the mammoths. We're talking about creatures that walked the surface of the earth tens of thousands of years ago and we have their genome and it's a serious proposal now that we're closing in on sequencing all the genes of a mammoth to bring the mammoth - by inserting a fertilized egg inside the womb of an elephant and having an elephant give birth to a mammoth.
Now dinosaurs are much more difficult. They perished 65 million years ago, not tens of thousands of years ago. However, something has happened that I thought would not happen in my lifetime and that is we have soft tissue from the dinosaurs. I never thought it would be possible in my lifetime. If you take a hadrosaur and crack open the thigh bones, bingo. You find soft tissue right there in the bone marrow. Who would have thought? T-Rex's too and scientists have analyzed not the DNA, but the proteins inside the soft tissue. Not surprisingly, we find the proteins of chickens and also frogs and reptiles, which means of course that dinosaurs we can now show biochemically are very closely related to birds. In fact, we think birds are dinosaurs that survived the cataclysm of 65 million years ago.
Now there is another proposal to use what is called epigenetics. Nature does not simply throw away good genes. Nature simply turns them off. For example, we have the genes in our own body that would put hair all over our body and you can actually turn that gene and create, quote, unquote, a werewolf. In fact, in Mexico City there are two young boys with hair all over their bodies that are acrobats in a circus and scientists have sequenced the genes and yes, it is a very ancient gene that they have.
With chickens we can actually see the genes for chickens that were turned off because of epigenetics, genes that give webbing between the toes of a chicken because a long time ago chickens had webbed feet and also teeth. You can actually bring back teeth inside chickens. So then the question is, is it possible to make the next big leap to use epigenetics, to use gene therapy, to use all the different kinds of therapies we have, mix all these things up in the memory of a computer and have the computer give the best fit for a reptile that is like a dinosaur, insert that perhaps, into the womb of maybe an alligator or a whatever and perhaps give birth to an egg, which will hatch something resembling a dinosaur.
Well that's not possible today, but it's not out of the question. It's not out of the question that at some point in the future we'll use a computer to take all these bits of DNA from living lizards, from the—extracting information from the proteins of soft tissue from hadrosaurs and assemble the best mathematical approximation to a dinosaur and have it give birth to an egg.

Directed / Produced by Elizabeth Rodd and Jonathan Fowler

Dinosaurs and humans -- did they live together? -- Creation Magazine LIVE! (2-09)

CMIcreationstation^{📤 5 years ago 2013-03-05}

What fossil evidence supports dinosaurs and humans living at the same time? Do scientists ever find dinosaurs buried with animals that were not supposed to have evolved yet?

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
Dinosaur soft tissue and protein—even more confirmation! ( )
Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really? ( )
Dinosaur Questions and Answers page ( )
Vestigial organs revisited ( )

Related Products:
Untold Secrets of Planet Earth: Dire Dragons ( )
Dinosaur challenges and mysteries ( )
Dinosaurs by design ( )
Creation Answers Book ( )

T-rex bone blood not 70mil years old

ninnzbinnz^{📤 10 years ago 2008-01-27}

an interveiw with the people who were involved in the find and research on the t-rex bone that has blood and elastic tissue in it.

The evidence that hemoglobin has indeed survived in this dinosaur bone (which casts immense doubt upon the 'millions of years' idea) is, to date, as follows:

The tissue was coloured reddish brown, the colour of hemoglobin, as was liquid extracted from the dinosaur tissue. Hemoglobin contains heme units. Chemical signatures unique to heme were found in the specimens when certain wavelengths of laser light were applied. Because it contains iron, heme reacts to magnetic fields differently from other proteins—extracts from this specimen reacted in the same way as modem heme compounds. To ensure that the samples had not been contaminated with certain bacteria which have heme (but never the protein hemoglobin), extracts of the dinosaur fossil were injected over several weeks into rats. If there was even a minute amount of hemoglobin present in the T. Rex sample, the rats' immune system should build up detectable antibodies against this compound. This is exactly what happened in carefully controlled experiments.

Evidence of hemoglobin, and the still-recognizable shapes of red blood cells, in unfossilized dinosaur bone is powerful testimony against the whole idea of dinosaurs living millions of years ago. It speaks volumes for the Bible's account of a recent creation.

Fossil mix ups – When fossils are found where they shouldn’t be (Creation Magazine LIVE! 4-16)

CMIcreationstation^{📤 3 years ago 2015-02-17}

Whoops! What happens when scientists find fossils in the ‘wrong’ evolutionary sequence? This week, learn how the neat, ordered sequence of fossils required by evolution theory has serious problems, but fits wonderfully with the Bible. The facts reveal that the evolutionary timeline is wrong.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program shows how the latest scientific discoveries support the Bible and refute evolution and million of years.

Related Articles:
Fossils Q&A page ( )
Ken Ham/ Bill Nye debate analysis ( )

Related Products:
The Fossil Record ( )
Creation magazine (free sample copy) ( )

Definitive (Observable) Evidence Regarding The Flat Earth | David Rives

David Rives Ministries^{📤 2 years ago 2016-08-09}

SUBSCRIBE (above) for new inspirational videos!
LIKE David’s FB page here:
FOLLOW us on Twitter:
VISIT our official website for tons of free information:
David Rives MUSIC:
For the TBN show “Creation in the 21st Century”:

David Rives is the host of "Creation in the 21st Century" on TBN, singer/songwriter, and author of the book "Wonders Without Number".

Browse through our YouTube channel to be educated, entertained, and inspired - and don't forget to subscribe for new videos every week.

Those who have followed my work over the years know that I use VERY large telescopes to observe (and take photos of) space. Astronomy was the passion that fueled my journey to where I am today.

Well, recently several people have approached me about the possibility of the flat earth. Basically they say that they believe the earth is like a pancake with all of the continents and the oceans resting on the top of the pancake. Now, that immediately sounds way out there, but I'm willing to take an educated look at anything, regardless of how implausible it sounds.

So, let’s take a look, from a flat-earth perspective, and see if this is even possible.

Leonardo the mummy dinosaur - First Look January 2003

LeonardoProject2011^{📤 7 years ago 2011-03-06}

The mummified and then fossilized remains of the hadrosaur dinosaur nicknamed Leonardo is the most complete dinosaur fossil ever discovered. More than 100 scientists and technicians participated in what was an unprecedented research project to unlock the secrets of this remarkable fossil. For more information visit dinosaurmummy.org. Video courtesy MPH Entertainment

Ian Juby: Lying About Hadrosaur Skin Fossils

Baud Bits^{📤 5 years ago 2013-05-14}

This use of derivative material is legal under US Copyright Law.
References:

Juby's Effluent

Canadian Light Source - Media Release

(fossil)

How to Make a Fossil Part 2 -- Dinosaur Mummies

Mineralized soft-tissue structure and chemistry in a mummified hadrosaur from Hell Creek

Zhang et al Paper
Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of cretaceous dinosaurs and birds

Wogelius et al Paper
Trace metals as biomarkers for eumelanin pigment in the fossil record

Phillip Manning
Grave Secrets of Dinosaurs: SOft Tissues and Hard Science

Background Music
"Pixel Peeker Polka - faster" Kevin MacLeod - Incompetech.com

Did Dinosaurs Really Go Extinct?

It's Okay To Be Smart^{📤 3 years ago 2015-06-08}

Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃) . Support your local PBS Member Station here:

Welcome to… Jurassic Pluck
Subscribe: Twitter: @jtotheizzoe @okaytobesmart
↓ More info and sources below ↓

Most people are taught that dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago when a giant meteor crashed into the Yucatan peninsula. I'm here to tell you that's wrong. Dinosaurs are alive and well today, and you don't have to go to Jurassic World to see them (although hanging out with Chris Pratt would be cool)
We have living dinosaurs all around us. We just call them "birds". Yes. Birds are dinosaurs.

The tetrapod playlist:

Special thanks to Scott Hartman ( ) for the great Deinonychus and Archaeopteryx illustrations

More info/sources:

Great Audubon article on dinosaur-bird evolution
Dig deeper with this hour-long Yale lecture by Dr. Richard Prum:
Dr. John Hutchinson's research on dinosaur/bird posture

Chickens wearing prosthetic tails, for science!

T. rex had a wishbone:
Did prey grasping of dinosaurs evolve into bird flight stroke?
Reconstructing dinosaur sounds
Great TED-Ed video on the evolution of feathers in dinosaurs:
Brian Switek on dinosaur feathers:
What do birds see?
Tetrachromacy and feathers in dinosaurs:

Have an idea for an episode or an amazing science question you want answered? Leave a comment or check us out at the links below!
Follow on Twitter:

Follow on Tumblr:
Follow on Instagram:

-----------------
It's Okay To Be Smart is written and hosted by Joe Hanson, Ph.DFollow me on Twitter: @jtotheizzoe
Email me: itsokaytobesmart AT gmail DOT com
Facebook:
Google+
For more awesome science, check out:
Produced by PBS Digital Studios:

Joe Hanson - Creator/Host/Writer
Joe Nicolosi - Director
Amanda Fox - Producer, Spotzen IncKate Eads - Associate Producer
Andrew Matthews - Editing/Motion Graphics/Animation
Katie Graham - Director of Photography
John Knudsen - Gaffer

Theme music: "Ouroboros" by Kevin MacLeod

Other music via APM
Stock images from Shutterstock, stock footage from Videoblocks
Birds of paradise clips via PBS Nature

-----------------

Last week's video:
The Energy Series!

More videos:
Why Does February Have 28 Days?
Why Vaccines Work
Why Are Some People Left-Handed?
Where Does the Smell of Rain Come From?

NOVA scienceNOW : 30 - Trex Blood

araniel^{📤 6 years ago 2012-08-05}

Paleobiologist Mary Schweitzer has defied the long-held belief that it is fruitless to search for preserved soft tissues in dinosaur remains. Most experts thought that such structures would have decayed and vanished long ago, but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.

Turkish subtitles will be added soon.

No copyright intended, all the copyrights belong to PBS NOVA.

Support PBS!

Or donate:

Dinosaur soft tissue with Brian Thomas

Evidence Press^{📤 3 years ago 2015-10-13}

In this interview Brian Thomas says, "...science shows that these bio-materials fall apart at a regular rate under the optimum preservation conditions. Best case scenario, it still falls apart. Why, because of the second law of thermodynamics." He continued by saying the fact that bio-materials fall apart applies to all of biology, there are no exceptions.

Evolutionists have generally divided into two views for explaining the soft-tissue discoveries. One view realizes that tissue and proteins simply do not survive for millions of years. Therefore, they conclude this is not original dinosaur tissue. It must be some type of contamination or microbial biofilm.

Another view accepts that extensive testing has shown it is original tissue still remaining in these fossils. This view claims that iron or other factors have somehow preserved the material for millions of years. They do not see it as a problem to explain how tissue is still present in 68 million years old fossils.

Neither of these views considers the more obvious explanation; evolutionary dates for dinosaurs are wrong! If assigned dinosaur ages are wrong, then the dates of all fossils are probably wrong. For evolutionists, this is simply unthinkable. Instead, many evolutionists want to minimize the significance and limit the discussion of the soft-tissue discoveries. However, we want to spread this information to everyone. We want to promote lots of discussion. This is why we are producing Echoes of the Jurassic. Everyone needs to hear about it!

Scientific evidence can not justify soft tissue in fossils.wmv

What is^{📤 6 years ago 2012-01-07}

The bone itself has long dominated the field of paleontology, a result of the belief that no tissue could be found in an extinct dinosaur bone. By all the rules of paleontology it is believed that soft tissue can survive at most for a few tens of thousands of years, not 65 million years.

Dr. Mary Schweitzer, an associate professor of marine, earth and atmospheric sciences, created the molecular paleontology field of study. While studying dissolved pieces of a T-Rex bone, she found something that should not have been there: soft tissue [stretchy fibrous matrix, three-dimensional supple bone cells intact and translucent blood vessels].

In January 2004 a fragment of medullary bone was soaked in dilute acid to remove some calcium phosphate. This is an unusual procedure since scientists assume that a fossilized dinosaur consists of rock that would entirely dissolve in acid.

"Everyone knows how soft tissues degrade," Dr. Schweitzer says. "If you take a blood sample and you stick it on a shelf, you have nothing recognizable in about a week. So why would there be anything left in dinosaurs?"

Dr. Schweitzer also examined a piece of the dinosaur's cortical bone. "We stuck the bone in the same kind of solution," she says. "The bone mineral dissolved away, and it left these transparent blood vessels. I took one look, and I just said: 'Uh-uh. This isn't happening. This is just not happening.' " She started applying the same treatment to bone fragments from another dinosaur that she had acquired for her dissertation. "Sure enough," she says, "vessels all over the place."

Less than a month later Dr. Schweitzer found what looked like perfectly formed osteocytes, the cells inside bone.

Other discoveries:
Once, when Dr. Schweitzer was working with a T-Rex skeleton harvested from Hell Creek, she noticed that the fossil exuded a distinctly organic odor. "It smelled just like one of the cadavers we had in the lab who had been treated with chemotherapy before he died," she says. It was believed that such fossils were made up entirely of minerals. To most paleontologists, the smell of death did not even register. To Dr. Schweitzer, it meant that traces of life might still cling to those bones.

In the early 1990s Dr. Schweitzer studied the technical aspects of adhering fossil slices to microscope slides. A collaborator brought a T-Rex slide to a conference and showed it to a pathologist, who examined it under a microscope. "The guy looked at it and said, 'Do you realize you've got red blood cells in that bone?' " Dr. Schweitzer remembers. "My colleague brought it back and showed me, and I just got goose bumps, because everyone knows these things don't last for 65 million years."

Dr. Schweitzer ruled out contaminants and mineral structures, then she analyzed the putative. In one test rats were injected with the dinosaur fossil extract; the rodents produced antibodies that responded to turkey and rabbit hemoglobins. All the data supported the conclusion that the T-Rex fossil contained fragments of hemoglobin molecules. "The most likely source of these proteins is the once-living cells of the dinosaur," she wrote in a 1997 paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

When a group of fossil hunters found a cluster of preserved bird eggs in a city dump in Neuquén, Argentina, they originally believed the shells contained nothing but sand. When the remains were analyzed by scanning electron and atomic force microscopes it was concluded that the 70-million-year-old eggs still held embryos containing intact collagen.

Dr. Schweitzer published her findings in the journal Science.

"I invite the reader to step back and contemplate the obvious, this discovery gives immensely powerful support to the proposition that dinosaur fossils are not millions of years old at all, but were mostly fossilized under catastrophic conditions a few thousand years ago at most." - Carl Wieland

‘Magicians of the Gods’, snapshots of a work in progress

GrahamHancockDotCom^{📤 3 years ago 2015-01-06}

In late 2015 Graham Hancock will bring out his new book, ‘Magicians of the Gods’, the sequel to his worldwide bestseller ‘Fingerprints of the Gods’. In this lecture, recorded in March 2014 for Alternatives London at Saint James’s Church in Piccadilly, he reviews his past work and shares some of the research for the new book.

Order your copy of Magicians of the Gods:
Amazon:
B&N:
iTunes:

See more here:

-------------------------------------------------------------
Filmed by Feel That Way ProdUKtions.
For information about lecture and event video production contact dean_huson@yahoo.co.uk

Evidence against evolution (Part 1 of 6) Evidence for intelligent design

GoldenLightD^{📤 8 years ago 2010-03-18}

Discussion programme featuring 4 creationists explaining the evidence against the theory of evolution.
Presented by surgeon Dr Vij Sodera, with guests David Rosevear PHD chemistry, Paul Garner BSc (Hons) geology/biology, Philip Bell BSc (Hons) zoology

present observable evidence against evolution theory
evidence for intelligent design

T.R.U.T.H. about the Dinosaurs: Soft Tissue

theTRUTHgroup^{📤 10 years ago 2008-05-07}

Click this link to watch a video about the people involved in this blood cell discovery.

Check out this link for more information about this topic.

[This clip is an excerpt from the DVD project "T.R.U.T.H. about the Dinosaurs", which can be found on-line at theTRUTHgroup.com or at livingwaters.com.]

Shocking Find! - Dinosaurs found to be living recently (Mark Harwood)

Christian Media Productions^{📤 6 years ago 2011-11-26}

Dr Mark Harwood unravels evidence showing that dinosaurs lived within the last few centuries! Who knew?

This is part of a 20 episode series.

CMP is a Christian Media Production company - check out our latest programs: facebook.com/christianmediaproductions

Dinosaur with skin discovered

news672^{📤 10 years ago 2007-12-06}

Dinosaur with skin discovered

Archaeology supports the Bible (Creation Magazine LIVE! 7-06)

CMIcreationstation^{📤 7 months ago 2018-03-07}

Archaeological discoveries provide powerful support for the accuracy of Scripture. Today we highlight fascinating portions of an interview with a leading archaeologist.

Special Thanks:
John DeLancey – Tel Gezer footage

biblicalisraeltours.com (Life-Transforming Israel Tours & Teaching in the Context of the Land of the Bible)

The Mental Metal Channel – sifting footage

Lia Lapithi Shukuroglou – footage of small gods

Gabriel Colodro – Hebrew Torah Writing

Other footage sources:
Hunter McLaughlin - more of Tel Gezer

Bible Vision HD – even more of Tel Gezer

TheJerusalemCenter – Timeline of Israel

Philistine Pots from Gezer
haaretz.com/jewish/archaeology/1.739358.JPG

20th Century Fox – Exodus footage

Ruth Martin – mud (earth)

New York Times - Ebla Map

Pinterest – Lugal-kisal-si, king of Uruk

Ebla Tablets
gazeteduvar.com.tr/kultur-sanat/2016/08/13/tanrilarin-laneti-tabletleri-calanlarin-ustunde-olsun/

PHD Comics – Dead Sea Scrolls

Narak Saron – monkeys

TWI/Granada Television – Hitler in Colour

Related Articles:
Archaeologist confirms creation and the Bible ( )
Where does history begin? ( )

Related Products:
The Creation Answers Book ( )
Christianity for Skeptics ( )
Creation magazine (free sample copy) ( )

Bye-bye, big bang?

CMIcreationstation^{📤 7 years ago 2011-09-17}

For more details visit:

One of the pillars of the Big Bang theory is that the light we see from objects far away has a higher redshift than closer objects. However, quasars with a very high redshift have been discovered in and near galaxies that have a low redshift. Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith explain what this means for the Big Bang.

Main article:
From Creation magazine 29(2) Bye-bye, big bang? ( )

Related articles
• What is redshift? ( )
• High-redshift quasars produce more big bang surprises ( )
• Astronomy and Astrophysics Q&A page ( )
• Quasar with enormous redshift found embedded in nearby spiral galaxy ( )

For more information on the creation/evolution issue visit

Homology -- do common structures imply common ancestor? (Creation Magazine LIVE! 3-24)

CMIcreationstation^{📤 4 years ago 2014-02-01}

Similarities in living things is hailed as knock-down evidence for evolution. This week, find out why it actually powerfully supports Biblical creation.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
Do similarities between creatures prove that they had a common ancestor? (from the Creation Answers Book, Chapter 7) ( )
Homology made simple ( )
Are look-alikes related? ( )
Apes and Humans: 99% similar? (Creation Magazine LIVE! Season 2 Ep# 23) ( )
Estimates of Human-Chimp DNA similarity revaluated using omitted data ( )
Does Homology provide evidence for evolutionary naturalism? ( )

Related Products:
Apemen: 'Missing Links' & The Bible DVD ( )
Bones of Contention ( )
Creation Answer's Book ( )

Recreating Dinosaurs

Discovery UK^{📤 9 years ago 2009-02-27}

Scientist Raul Cono attempts to extract Dinosaur DNA from insects encased in amber.

Evolution Embarrassed YET AGAIN! Dinosaur Soft Tissue - NOT "Biofilm!"

PNN News and Ministry Network (www.ppsimmons.com)^{📤 5 years ago 2013-04-05}

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

our blog to comment on our material...
ppsimmons.blogspot.com

Hear Carl Gallups (narrator) every Friday - 1330 WEBY AM - Gulf Coast Talk Radio
Freedom Friday With Carl Gallups
LISTEN LIVE ON THE NET or YOUR SMART PHONE!

LINKS
=======

GET THE BOOK HERE!

MORE CARL GALLUPS MINISTRY MATERIAL

HOW TO BE SAVED

HOW TO KNOW IF YOU ARE IN A CULT

ASK QUESTIONS OR GET HELP WITH SALVATION - Click the EMAIL LINK

THE MAGIC MAN IN THE SKY: Effectively Defending The Christian Faith - Carl Gallups

MAGIC MAN - PROMO VIDEO - 1 and 1/2 minutes long

MAGIC MAN - FACEBOOK PAGE - LIKE US for Free Books!

MAGIC MAN YOUTUBE CHANNEL - SUB US for free books!

READ EXCERPTS FROM THE BOOK HERE!

Dinosaur Valley State Park, Texas [Official]

Texas Parks and Wildlife^{📤 9 years ago 2009-08-06}

Dinosaur Valley State Park contains some of the best preserved dinosaur tracks in the world. Two model dinosaurs help visitors envision what the site was like back when dinosaurs roamed the land. About an hour southwest of Fort Worth in Glen Rose, the park offers a limestone creek for swimming and fishing, as well as hiking and biking trails through the rocky hills. For more information, visit

Walking With Dinosaurs: LIVE T-Rex

Kyle sanford^{📤 11 years ago 2007-07-16}

The end of the show with the entrance of the mother T-Rex, a fight, and the meteor hitting.

How Does Radiocarbon Dating Work? - Instant Egghead #28

Scientific American^{📤 5 years ago 2012-12-04}

How do scientists determine the age of fossils that have been under the surface of the earth for thousands of years? Scientific American Editor Michael Moyer explains the process of radiocarbon dating.

--

WATCH more Instant Egghead:
SUBSCRIBE to our channel:
VISIT ScientificAmerican.com for the latest science news:

Dinosaur to bird evolution 5of5

djarm67^{📤 9 years ago 2008-11-10}

Today's scientists are recreating dinosaurs through genetic engineering. Sounds like science fiction? Not any longer.

Through rapid advances in genetics, scientists are discovering the genetic traits of dinosaurs in the DNA of birds. They are showing that it is possible to bring back teeth, long tails and hands in place of wings. In Dinosaurs: Return to Life, learn why the dream of recreating the dinosaur genome is coming closer to reality.

Ever since Mary Higby Schweitzer peeked inside the fractured thighbone of a Tyrannosaurus rex, the introverted scientist's life hasn't been the same. Neither has the field of paleontology.

In 2004, Schweitzer gazed through a microscope in her laboratory at North Carolina State University and saw lifelike tissue that had no business inhabiting a fossilized dinosaur skeleton: fibrous matrix, stretchy like a wet scab on human skin; what appeared to be supple bone cells, their three-dimensional shapes intact; and translucent blood vessels that looked as if they could have come straight from an ostrich at the zoo.

An alternate hypothesis has been suggested that the "soft" tissues are in actual fact bacterial biofilms. Kaye TG, Gaugler G, Sawlowicz Z (2008) Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms.

Whilst certain organisations continue to parrot the phrase "no transitional fossils have ever been found" the list of species which possess transitional features continues to grow.

Epidexipteryx hui, Protoavis, Protarchaeopteryx, Archeopteryx, Avimimus, Sinosauropteryx, Caudipteryx, Rahonavis, Shuvuuia, Sinornithosaurus, Beipiasaurus, Microraptor, Nomingia, Epidendrosaurus, Cryptovolans, Scansoriopteryx, Yixianosaurus, Dilong, Pedopenna, Jinfengopteryx, Sinocalliopteryx, Sinornis, Ambiortus, Hesperornis, Ichthyornis

Every home should have the Discovery Channel

Protein synthesis, DNA translation, m-RNA transcription

Creation Ministries International^{📤 7 years ago 2011-06-27}

Animation of protein synthesis; DNA translation, m-RNA transcription in a ribosome, protection of the nascent protein from mis-folding with chaperones and folding of the protein in a chaperonin.

Related Articles:
DNA: marvellous messages or mostly mess?:
Cell systems—what's really under the hood continues to drop jaws:
Splicing and dicing the human genome:
The genetic puppeteer:

Related Products:
The Creation Answers Book -
Creation Magazine subscription -
Exploring the World of Biology book -
The Mystery of Our Declining Genes DVD -

Dinosaur to bird evolution 1of5

djarm67^{📤 9 years ago 2008-11-10}

Origins: Immortal Proteins?

Cornerstone Television Network^{📤 2 weeks ago 2018-10-01}

Join Origins host Ray Heiple as he welcomes, Dr. Kevin Anderson for, “Immortal Proteins?” For several years now scientists have been baffled upon finding soft tissue in dinosaur bones. Fragments of several types of proteins have been extracted from these dinosaur fossils. Protein degradation studies contradict the claims by evolutionists that certain conditions could preserve proteins in a buried fossil for millions of years. Instead, they reveal direct evidence that these fossils are only a few thousand years old.

#OR1815

Dinosaur Protein Denial